About Me

My photo
My Fellow Americans, Vote For Silvia Stagg For President! Republican-Independent 2011-2040 General Election

Monday, April 9, 2012

Wikileaks: Julian Assange Appeal Dismissed, Extradition Or Third Appeal To Follow?

 Julian Assange Co-Founder/Chief Editor of Wikileaks



It appears both the High Court at the Strand, London-England and Attorneys for Julian Assange failed to protect protect Julian Assange and enforce the law and rights of due process under the law, with proper argument, and case management including fair treatment of Julian Assange. The Court dismissed the Second Assange Appeal, allowing Extradition of Julian Assange to Sweden.  Julian Assange as Wikileaks Co-Founder-Editor-In-Chief of a well known media-whistle blower outlet based in Sweden, supplies the public, the media and governments worldwide with information. This information often leads to investigations and removal of societal and government persons from position.  By so doing, Wikileaks and Julian Assange provides for the protection of the free mind and free speech of the public, the media and all good government personnel worldwide!  Inherent in the foregoing, is the publics' right to know and the medias' right to know and the governments' right to know, and their right to have discourse, inquiry, remedy and so forth.  Wikileaks has always operated in good faith and has received Awards for operating in good faith and in the best interests of the public, the media, and good government. 


Since the inception of Wikileaks, December 2006, Wikileaks has never caused any physical harm nor endangerment to anyone.   Additionally, Wikileaks never released any Secret Technology, Technology Designs nor Formulas protected by Espionage Laws.  Yet, on Tuesday, November 2-2011, in his usual calm and polite demeanor, a saddened Julian Assange stood briefly and  solemnly before the media, and he stated and implied, "His Appeal was denied and he would examine his options."  [ See Exhibit 'A' - Copy of Four (4) Page Summary By Judiciary of England and Wales - Titled: Summary To Assist The Media - For A Copy of Exhibit 'A' Go To Google+silviastagg  and Twitter.com@silvia_stagg


Tragically, the world is on the brink of 1984 Oppression should we the world, lose Wikileaks. The reader should be aware that the majority of the cases handled through the offices of the United States Attorney are government corruption cases.   Part of standard media operations is the cultivation of sources and confirmation of source allegations or claims. To maintain its credibility the media always investigates or researches any potential story and its viability.  'The Great Story' otherwise known as the 'Media Scoop' often utilizes whistle blower activities.  The Governments of the world and the United States of America are bowing to the Dictatorial Demands of Barack Obama whose Harvard University Law Degree has never been evident in his Presidency. The Obama Administration's daily black ops technology onslaught against a Wikileaks supportive world audience including the United States of America by stating that  'National Security' is endangered or people have been harmed is false. However, the actual damage of being subjected to the temper tantrums of a Black Racist Dictator misusing Black Ops Technology are causing sunami like reactions worldwide.  Ultimately, bringing about the demise of the exercise of Freedom of Thought, Free Speech, of Freedom of the Press, of Public Discourse. And the necessary Remedies which ensue when at last, Incompetence and Corruption are exposed!  And all that it means and as we know it today.  Many years ago, the Media scored a major loss, forced in some instances by Courts of Law to disclose Confidential Sources. Some Media Personnel went to jail to protect sources who only had secrecy to protect them from retaliation for revealing sensitive information to the public and government via the media.

Getting back to the Assange Appeal and the correct argument by Assange Attorneys. They asserted, the request and issuance of an EAW/European Arrest Warrant according to the Constitution of the United Kingdom, should have been made before and by a Judicial Authority, a Judge.  And further thereto, a Judge with no self interest except the pursuit of truth, fairness, law, and justice upheld (See Sections 'i. and c.25' Judicial Decision-To View/Copy Judicial Decision Go To http://www.justiceforassange.com/).  However, the November 2-2011 Judicial Decision went further, stating, the Attorneys for Assange were in error, "Mr. Assange did not pursue the allegation made before the Senior District Judge that there had been abuse in issuing the EAW for a collateral purpose or that there had otherwise been an abuse of process." It is quite true that the Assange Attorneys should have argued False Arrest and Malicious Prosecution from the beginning, and if they did not do so, it is extremely alarming.

This writer asserts that part of the 'Judicial Review' Process inherent in any legal matter before any court is to determine the viability of a case and likelihood of guilt of the person to be subpoenaed and warranted and for 'good cause shown.' And only a Judge in a Court of Proper jurisdiction can issue a warrant or subpoena. The questioning of an individual may lead to further legal course of action, and is subject to legal issues.  The right not to self incriminate and more importantly an innocent mans' words taken out of context should he try to explain a difficult situation during explosive circumstances of corruption must be examined. The character and motives of all parties making allegations or defending against allegations must always be considered.  All of the foregoing must be taken into account if a legal case is to be maturely represented.  Attorneys and Judges are 'Officers of the Court.' They are charged with performing proper, just and fair case review and management for each and every legal matter before their court.  Now possibly necessary, is a Judicial Administrative Review.   And in the immediate future the  'Recusal' of any of these presiding Judges, to allow Julian Assange to Appeal to the Supreme Court. Although, the Court did provide recourse for an Appeal citing the improper handling of his case in Judicial Decision Paragraph/Number '7.'

When one recalls the content of the well written November 2-2011 Judicial Decision, 'Paragraph/Number 7', the wrongful issuance of an EAW, was indeed repeatedly argued before the media and public. Julian Assange and his Attorneys always verbally claim during Media Interview-Photo Opportunities that "the issuance of the EAW was 'foul play' due to Julian Assange being Co-Founder-Chief Editor of Wikileaks" (citing corruption-criminal retaliation-obstruction of justice) in terms of an "EAW which was issued due to 'Political Motivations and without a Judicial Authority.'"  Furthermore, the Attorneys for Julian Assange did appropriately argue in their legal papers, that the law is not being upheld (with equal treatment toward Julian Assange) as per the Constitutional Mandate and Practice of Law in the United Kingdom. Whereby an EAW must be issued by a "Judicial Authority" of unimpeachable character. This writer, can only pray that the Attorneys for Julian Assange or another Civil and Human Rights Attorney Firm vigorously and correctly files and argues an Appeal to the British Supreme Court on behalf of Julian Assange and Wikileaks or the world will face more 1984 tactics. Lost will we be, when we are left with a world devoid of Human volition and liberty, a lobotomized brainwashed society.  Literally torturing free thought and free speech and free will from ones' soul in a myriad of ways.

The Attorneys for Julian Assange did issue a very wordy and polite General Denial which is the manner of our well spoken and well written British Counterparts. Yet, perhaps we need also use the more direct and concisely put, "No Rape-No Molestation-No Coercion Occurred Whatsoever between Julian Assange and Any Woman/Nor These Two Women." The serious nature of harming or jeopardizing a person closely affiliated with a media-whistle blower outlet is disastrous. And such actions are against the public and governments' best interests. These heinous acts against Julian Assange and Wikileaks in its entirety including its staff/volunteers and their families must cease. And before Julian Assange is illegally Extradited to Sweden. It is a corrupt Swedish Prosecutor-Swedish Authorities who "refuses to question Julian Assange in the United Kingdom, insisting it must be done in Sweden."

One would hope that further irrevocable harm upon this great man, Julian Assange and his Wikileaks is prevented. To date, Wikileaks, its staff/volunteers and Julian Assange and their families have been subjected to a massive hunt, torture, and endangerment. Thus, destroying their well built socioeconomic base of support, by means of unlawful bankruptcy maneuvers by heinous Black Ops Technology Offenders.  Since December 2010, and possibly prior thereto, Seditionists such as Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Palin, and Pentagon Secretaries Leon Panetta (Former CIA Director) and Robert Gates (Retired Spring 2011), have been hunting the famous Wikileaks. They are further angry and embarrassed by Wikileaks' videotape airing two media personnel whose death/murder was caused by our US Military.  No doubt, other fine works of Wikileaks must infuriate all corrupted souls.  Much unlike myself who delights in their existence, appreciative that yet another menace to society is neutralized!  And since December 2010, our Black Ops Technology Seditionists purposely interfere with Visa-MasterCard-PayPal Payments to Wikileaks and Julian Assange. They hope to more than socioeconomically destroy Julian Assange and Wikileaks (inclusive their staff-volunteers and respective families)  regardless of any Indictment, and before going to trial!  It was a regretful Julian Assange who announced more than once in 2011, "Wikileaks may cease operations due to an illegal Financial Blockade" by the United States and their accomplices!

The Mission Statement of Wikileaks is: "We Open Governments." Indeed that is exactly what they do. And Wikileaks is often criticized and isolated by a contrary world who also frequently, proudly and affectionately refers to their Wikileaks Personnel as the 'Rock Stars of The Media.'  Despite our transitory perceptions and opinions, one observation has become perfectly clear, the worlds' population must rise and assist Wikileaks and Julian Assange.  Not just voice our protest, but financially and legally save them before they receive a wrongful Indictment, Conviction, Prison Sentence or Death Penalty from our Seditionary United States of America!  And we are left with a dagger in our heart, possibly forever...

Luckily, on November 15-2011, the Assange Attorneys filed a Third Appeal, citing "lack of Judicial Authority for the issuance of an EAW."  Though, Assange Attorneys failed to correct what appears to be 'Attorney Error-Malpractice' for failing to cite "an abuse in issuing the EAW for a collateral purpose and/or an abuse of process."  The Third Appeal was heard on two days by the British Supreme Court, on February 1-2 2012, and not between December 19-25-2011 as originally feared. A date, so wanted by a man, thus far denied his rights to due process.   And Julian Assange has been denied other rights and freedoms under the Constitution of the United Kingdom.  For example, Julian Assange illegally held under House Arrest with ankle monitor and daily reporting to local police even after bail was expeditiously raised is a violation of Julian Assanges' civil and human rights according to American Jurisprudence. Adding to these torrential circumstances, this year at least one Wikileaks staff-volunteer was illegally detained upon entering the United States of America. His whereabouts and status are illegally kept secret.

Wikileaks as a corporation (a separate entity) requires attorney representation, and is held harmless in all of this fiasco.  Technically, Wikileaks cannot be legally closed because of the dispute regarding its officers or employees or volunteers disseminating government files.  Any Indictment against Wikileaks (in its entirety) or Julian Assange has no foundation in law nor case law.   It was Spring-Summer 2011, the US Congress announced and reannounced  that Julian Assange passed his brain tap and Julian Assange is innocent of Rape and Innocent with No Malice (only the desire to make this a better world) regarding his motive for disseminating many thousands of US Pages-Files-Documents. Thus, clearing the good name of Julian Assange from further consideration for Indictment under The Espionage Act of 1917 and/or Patriot Acts, and so forth. The US Congress went as far as authorized myself to compose supportive Affidavits to prevent another miscarraige of justice in regards to the USA paper dissemination matter.  And for so doing, the US Congress, Wikileaks and its staff and their respective families and myself and my family were viciously attacked by Barack Obama and his murderous Rape Entourage misusing Black Ops Technology.  [See Exhibits B-C-D-E-F Attached Hereto and located at: Google+silviastagg and Twitter.com@silvia_stagg as Follows:  Copies of Two (2) Two (2) Page Affidavits Dated December 21-2010 and December 27-2010 both with Photo Fax Confirmations and Copy of a Two (2) Page Cover Letter/Affidavit dated January 2-2011 and notarized on January 4-2011 (both second pages included therein) with Photo Fax Confirmations and Copy of One (1) Page Affidavit dated July 28-2011 By Silvia Stagg/US Congress regarding Innocent/Moral Brain Tap of Julian Assange in the USA Paper Dissemination Case and One (1) Page Affidavit dated April 24-2012 by Silvia Stagg/US Congress (with Fax Confirmations/Photo Fax Confirmations) testifying to the Innocent/Moral Brain Tap of Julian Assange regarding Sweden's Rape Allegations of 2010] 

Unfortunately, Barack Obama and US Attorney Eric Holder are toying with the idea of setting another bad legal precedent.  One of the first bad legal precedents, was Barack Obama' Health Care Bill which forces the working poor to pay for their own insurance and should they fail to do so, a mandatory fine and/or imprisonment as punishment.  Any unconstitutional Legal Precedents set against Wikileaks (based in Sweden) or against Julian Assange will eventually be reviewed and overturned by a more Constitutionally sensitive President. Yet, not without much misery should our Judicial System be misused to harm Wikileaks and/or Julian Assange.  Historically, our US Congress has made its wishes known that, "Congress strongly objects to Judges who legislate from the Bench."

However, this dispute over document dissemination is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Barack Obama targeting and attacking the media worldwide. In March 2011, the heinous and repetitious abuse of Black Ops Technology by Barack Obama was finally aired on National-International Television via Channel 7/ABC's Good Morning America with George Stephanopulous. And this story concerned the US Army Microwave Frequency Brain Wave Alteration Technology being used against Three Media Reporters. Good Morning America and these three (3) Media Reporters (Two Men and One Woman) alleged Barack Obama severely interrupted their speech while reporting their respective news segments. Good Morning America questioned the US Army at the Pentagon or they questioned the Pentagon, who freely admitted to having this Microwave Frequency Brain Wave Alteration Technology. The media released a photograph of said device. And said device appeared to be at least ten square feet with a flat microwave dish at top. The Summer of 1998, this writer witnessed a larger version of this Microwave Frequency Brainwave Alteration Device driven by our US Army off corner of Niagara Street on 22nd Street in Niagara Falls-New York.  We can now assume the general public is endangered, altered by Microwave Frequency Brainwave Alteration Technology!

To date, we have an enraged Barack Obama threatening Microwave Frequency Brain Wave Alterations AKA 'Mind Turns' of the US Grand Jury (and any presiding Judges) to ensure an Indictment and Conviction and Imprisonment and/or the Death Penalty for Julian Assange and any assisting Wikileaks Personnel.  During America's National Security Emergency, Barack Obama has repeatedly announced by way of voice projection (air-radio-television) in Niagara Falls stating,  "he will interfere and instruct the Jury and Judges including US Supreme Court Judges to disallow individual review and consideration of each of the 340,000 pages." Though, the exact page number keeps increasing, as the circumstances become further exaggerated, the United States and media originally reported figures of 250,000 pages and 90,000 pages as having been disseminated onto the Internet by Wikileaks-Julian Assange.  The Obama Administration not wanting to allow Wikileaks nor Julian Assange to be considered as Media-Whistle Blower entities appears to be discounting the moral Brain Tap of Julian Assange clearing him of any malicious motives.        

The issue of what constitutes a US Document is important as this term is misused by our government and quoted by our media.  We are actually speaking of mostly pages in US File(s) and possibly some documents.  And their National Security importance and to whom must be individually assessed.  And so should their release.  Why are not the Swedish Authorities using their Staunch Whistle Blower Laws to protect Julian Assange and his Wikileaks regarding the disputed dissemination of 250,000 and 90,000 US Pages-Files-Documents?  Why are the Swedish so willing to comply with Extradition of Julian Assange to the United States of America?  Though, under Treaty, Sweden may allow the imprisonment of Julian Assange to be in Sweden if found guilty by US Courts. Lastly, why has our otherwise esteemed United States Attorney's office based out of Alexandria Virginia convened a Secret Grand Jury Investigation (simultaneously and since December 2010 to his false arrest without warrant signed by a Judge of appropriate Jurisdiction) while the United States of America hunts our Wikileaks Personnel and their social and professional circles as they during Sedition investigate attempting to Indict and Execute Julian Assange, our modern day Hero and his famous Wikileaks?  During a Constitutional Presidency Wikileaks, Julian Assange and the Department of Justice are on the same side of the legal fence!  It's obvious, Obama is using much too much Kriptonite on our Clark Kent of Superman!

Furthermore, we all learned during Congressional Public Inquiry that the second attack on the WTC/World Trade Center could have been avoided had the FBI/Federal Bureau of Investigation allowed any investigation of the possible endangerment to the WTC/World Trade Center to be publicized responsibly.  Regarding the Conspiracy to destroy both WTC/World Trade Center Towers which involved Nineteen (19) Saudi Arabians, it was an FBI Supervisory Female Agent turned 'Whistle Blower' from the Minneapolis-Minnesota FBI Office who publicly testified before Congress, stating, "she was threatened with employment dismissal if she contacted FBI Director Robert Mueller forewarning him of the impending attack on the WTC/World Trade Center Twin Towers and therefore did not do so."   It is well known, that initially during his first Presidential Campaign, George W. Bush argued 'War For Oil' before a Seditionary United States of American Public whose government and myself (an Internal Affairs National Security Victim Witness) dismissed his unconstitutional rational.  Historically, the Saudi Arabians are our Allies, and there was and is no public evidence available which proves  Saudi Arabian government involvement in 911!  Accordingly, we blamed the attack on a photograph of Ben Laudin with Sadham Hussein who reportedly received Ten Million US Dollars from Iraqs' former leader Sadham Hussein. In 1993, Sadham Hussein tried to assassinate former President George Herbert Walker Bush while he was in the area. Reportedly, George Herbert Walker Bush was visiting the 'No Fly Zone' boardering Iraq and Kuwait and/or in Saudi Arabia, most likely visiting US Military bases.  

This US Presidential Candidate was subjected to over One Hundred Fifty Black Ops Technology heart attacks, commencing Saturday March 26-2011 for one month by Barack Obama (the same day Barack Obama announced his Campaign for a second term of the US Presidency) and Barack Obama also perpetrated Five of the Eleven Illegal Evictions to which this National Security Victim Witness turned US Presidential Candidate was subjected since November 2-2005 and many other instances of criminal retaliation. In particular, the foregoing cited black ops technology induced 'heart attacks' continued for one month until ceased by one member of US Congress. And this member of Congress, a male, who along with another male member of Congress became another hunted, tortured, raped, and altered person with black ops technology induced sadistic depravity to his personality, while an emasculated US Congress watches hoping that they and this person survives to the next Presidency!  There is not a member of our US Congress who has not been stalked, harassed, tortured, raped, altered by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, and William Jefferson Clinton, et al, etc. and their Rape Entourage which includes over One Hundred One Plus (101+) Black Ops Murderous Fem Fetal Rapist Hoares used by the White House-US Congress for 'Influence Peddling' Purposes. The Foregoing, kept secret from this Non Inclusion National Security Victim Witness turned US Presidential Candidate! 

The herein cited Black Ops Technology abuses are the core of my extensive National Security Victim Witness Case (filed with US Department of Justice since 12/1994). Portions of my complaints or information thereof (Political Announcements) have been released to the Media before and after the Good Morning America Report at the behest of the United States Congress.  Naturally, this person complied in an effort to try to save ourselves including the US Congress and Presidential Candidates from Barack Obama's Black Ops Technology (torture, rape and manipulation) abuses! With such powerful technology is it little wonder why Barack Obama has not been removed from office?  [See Exhibits 'G-H-I' USDOJ Referral Letter from USDOJ Office of Crime Victims Director Thomas Kilmartin dated 4/1999, and FEC/Federal Election Commission Republican Party Candidate Status Confirmation for Silvia Stagg since August 4-2011, and RNC/Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus letter dated March 31-2011 to Silvia Stagg, Exhibits 'G-H-I' Attached Hereto and located at: Google+silviastagg and Twitter.com@silvia_stagg]


Sadly, upon information and belief, Wikileaks and at least One Hundred of its Volunteers - Staff including our beloved Julian Assange and their respective Families have been stalked - harassed - tortured - raped - manipulated via this Microwave Frequency Brainwave Alteration Technology Device. And former/current Wikileaks Volunteers/Staff are in dire need of restoration to their original bodies, minds, and souls and at least a one time excellent health for age healing as they have been severely tortured, raped, altered murdered and have sustained some permanent brain damage. While an all too powerful Dictator President Barack Obama will always be too powerful to bring to justice over this and his other many heinous black ops technology murderous-torturous-rape events via technology he has wrought to feed his sadistic depravity! The foregoing, must be properly addressed in some manner so at the very least these Public Black Ops Tech Crimes are brought to an end. The foregoing instances of severe black ops tech facilitated Stalking-Harassment-Torture-Rape, further mandates National Security Victim Witness Protection - Political Asylum - Financial Compensation for being the targeted Wikileaks and Julian Assange and their families!

This March 2012, upon obtaining some of the extensive Stratfor Email files, Wikileaks revealed that as of December 2010, a secret grand jury has already indicted Julian Assange, further supporting allegations of a malicious prosecution being sought against Julian Assange and Wikileaks for purposes of destroying them due to their media-whistle blower activities.  It can easily be argued that at that time, (actually at no time) could any evidence ever be presented before obtaining an indictment.  It appears  another malicious prosecution case may ensue by the United States Department of Justice under Psychotic Black Racists US Attorney General Eric Holder and Barack Obama (Black Ops Tech Murderous Rapists).  They are inclined to Anarchy against the White Christian European Descent Races' socioeconomic infrastructure built with our blood swear and tears.  




End of Article by Silvia Stagg
A Good Gnome Individual and
National Security Victim Witness and 
US Presidential Candidate
filed with FEC/Federal Election Commission and
US Office of Government Ethics

_________________________________________________________________________________


Note: Since the Third Assange Appeal was Denied/Dismissed, Julian Assange hosted  a Television Program Interviewing World officials News Channel RT between February 2012 - June 2012, and US Attorney General Eric Holder was 'Held In Contempt of Congress' (in a majority vote by Congress) For Withholding 'The Fast and Furious' Case File pertaining to a  Mexico-USA Boarder Guns/Drug Smuggling Case Involving the Murder of A Federal Boarder Agent. And on August 16-2012 the fine country of Ecuador, granted Political Asylum to Julian Assange, amidst an angry England threatening to invade the Embassy of Ecuador, and arrest and extradite Julian Assange to Sweden anyway. What next for our courageous Wikileaks, the world's media outlet!
- Silvia Stagg 




Above: Saturday August 18-2012
Julian Assange Upon The Ecuador Embassy Balcony
London, England - Julian Assange Speaking Before The World
with media present 




Swedish Prosecution Authority on Julian Assange case - The World at One, BBC Radio 4

1 day ago
play
0:00
/
2:16
Martha Kearney interviews Karin Rosander, Director of Communications for the Swedish Prosecution Authority




_____________________________________________________
Posting August 25-2012








Silvia Stagg

9:28 PM  -  Public

Anonymous originally shared this post:
The Ecuadorian government revealed that it received "a communication from the British Foreign Office which said that there was no threat to enter the embassy." #WikiLeaks  
Britain withdraws threat to raid Ecuador’s embassy — RT »
Ecuador says Britain has withdrawn a threat to raid its embassy to arrest WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange - easing tensions between the two nations in their ongoing diplomatic standoff.



Add a comment...


______________________________________________________

December 16-2010 Evening

Below: Julian Assange Just After Arraingment Hearing - Court Stairs - London, England












Below: 4 Page Media Summary By Englands' Supreme Court Re: Extradition To Sweden 
wiki6.pdf »
Below: Affidavit Re: Innocent Brain Tap of Julian Assange In USA Paper Dissemination Case with Fax Confirmations
JA USA Brain Tap.pdf »
Below: Affidavit Re: Innocent Brain Tap of Julian Assange In Sweden's Rape Case with Fax Confirmations
Sweden2.pdf »

Below: Cover Letter Notarized To David Cameron Itemizing Affidavits In Support of Julian Assange Faxed/Mailed JAN 4-2011 with Fax/UPS Mail Confirmations
wiki9.pdf »
Below: Two Page Affidavit Dated December 27-2010 In Support of Julian Assange - Wikileaks authorized by US Congress, et al with Fax Confirmations
wiki4.pdf »
Below: Two Page Affidavit Dated December 21-2012 In Support of Julian Assange - Wikileaks authorized by US Congress, et al with Fax Confirmations
wiki3.pdf »
Below: Two Page Cover Letter Dated Jan 2-2011 Notarized On Jan 4-2011 Sent to US Congress, USAG Eric Holder, Two US Attorneys, David Cameron in England, Sweden's Embassador Based In Washington DC, et al with Fax Confirmations  

 


Please Support:

Wikileaks: http://www.wikileaks.org/support.html





Wikileaks-Julian Assange Legal Updates: https://twitter.com/#%21/WLLegal

Contact Sources:  sva@fastmail.fm Media: svapress@fastmail.fm














Right: Between NOV 2011 - FEB 2012 - London, England: The Night Before Court Decision Re: Extradition To Sweden, Beloved Supporters held a Vigil For Wikileaks' Julian Assange 






_______________________________________________________________________________
Wikileaks - Julian Assange News Updates

June 19-2012 Julian Assange Seeking Political Asylum From Ecuadorian Embassy!


For Story Go To/See Below: google+  silviastagg

Julian Assange


_________________________________________________________________________________
Wikileaks - Julian Assange News Update:




Add a comment...


Anonymous








6:11 PM  -  Public

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has requested political asylum and is under the protection of the Ecuadorian embassy in London. According to a statement released by the embassy, "While the department assesses Mr Assange’s application, Mr Assange will remain at the embassy, under the protection of the Ecuadorian Government."

Julian Assange



Julian Assange seeking asylum in Ecuadorian embassy in London »


WikiLeaks founder walked into the embassy and asked for asylum under the United Nations human rights declaration
________________________________________
Wikileaks - Julian Assange News Updates
June 2012



About this site.

Read the latest from the Supreme Court Appeal.

NEWS


Supreme Court has found against Assange 5-2. The court has allowed a window to reopen the case based on a fair trial objection by Rose QC. Read the summary of the Judgment and more. Carl Bildt

The Swedish Foreign Minister announced Secretary Hillary Clinton’s "first visit [in] a very long time" four days after the judgment.


Stratfor e-mails have revealed that a sealed indictment has been issued by a secret grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, for Julian Assange. The email is dated 26 January 2011. This means that there has likely been a sealed extradition order for over a year, which will be activated (unsealed) against Assange in Sweden, Australia and the UK when the US Government gives the order.

The US Centre for Constitutional Rights (CCR) has issued a statement.

Recent developments

UK Crown Prosecution Services deny a Freedom of Information Act request in relation to communications with other "States" regarding potention extradition arrangements for Julian Assange, on the grounds that it may endanger the UK’s diplomatic relations with other countries.

_________________________________________________________________________________
Wikileaks - Julian Assange News Updates

May 2012





Photo

· ·


    • Thank you for contacting the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.
      Inboxx

      USAVAE-WEBMASTER
    • Thank you for contacting the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District ...
      3:43 PM (22 minutes ago)
      Thank you for contacting the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District ...

      USAVAE-WEBMASTER3:43 PM (22 minutes ago)
      Loading...

      USAVAE-WEBMASTER USAVAE.WEBMASTER@usdoj.gov

3:43 PM (22 minutes ago)

to me

Thank you for contacting the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia. If this is a matter we can address, your message will be relayed to the appropriate person for review. Should we require additional information, you will be contacted.

Please note:
The U.S. Attorney’s Office does not initiate the investigation of cases; we prosecute cases presented by investigative agencies (e.g., the FBI, your local police department, IRS, etc.). If you have a concern with a civil matter, you should seek counsel. If you are reporting a crime, please contact the appropriate law enforcement investigative office.

Reply Forward

10 older messages
Silvia Stagg---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: USAVAE-WEBMASTER <USAVAE.WEBMAS...
4:05 PM (0 minutes ago)

---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: USAVAE-WEBMASTER <USAVAE.WEBMAS...

Click here to Reply or Forward
about a minute ago ·

_________________________________________________________________________________
May 30-2012







Silvia Stagg



The English High Court Ruled Julian Assange Can Be Extradited with an EAW/European Arrest Warrant Not Signed by a Judge/Judicial Authority as per Englands' Constitution and Codified Laws. Assange Attorneys were granted a Stay of Two Weeks to Argue against an Issue Not Previously Raised Before Them.  - Silvia Stagg

___________________________________________

News Update:  Julian Assange Hosts RT Program Tuesday 7PM & 9PM






                                                                     



Wikileaks - Julian Assange News Update!
Second Post: May 14-2012 Monday!
First Post: February 2012








Silvia Stagg


Wikileaks: no proof that Julian Assange encouraged leak

Investigators in the United States are believed to have failed to find evidence to support a prosecution of Julian Assange, the head of WikiLeaks, for encouraging the leak of secret government documents.

Julian Assange lawyer fears 'hidden agenda' in case against WikiLeaks founder



Julian Assange arrives with his lawyer Jennifer Robinson for his extradition hearing at Belmarsh Magistrates' Court in east London Photo: REUTERS

Furious officials and congressmen have called for Mr Assange to be tried for "inducing" the disclosure of diplomatic cables by Bradley Manning, a US army private. Pte Manning, 23, is being held at a military base in Virginia on suspicion of leaking the official secrets, which have been reported by The Daily Telegraph.

Politicians including Mike Huckabee, a former Arkansas governor and prospective candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, have called for Mr Assange to be executed if convicted. Yet lawyers for the FBI and the US department of justice have not found evidence that Mr Assange told Pte Manning to hand WikiLeaks the files, according to reports.

They may be forced to try to prosecute the WikiLeaks chief for conspiracy, a case that would be harder to prove and at odds with their statements that Mr Assange took advantage of the young soldier.

It is thought the investigators found no evidence linking Mr Assange directly with Pte Manning. He has maintained that he had no communication with the soldier.

Mr Assange is in London fighting extradition to Sweden over unrelated allegations of sexual crimes, which he denies.
Share
10K
Facebook
10K
Twitter
136
Email
LinkedIn
33




Home»

Monday 14 May 2012




_________________________________________________________________

WikiLeaks: Julian Assange given peace prize

Julian Assange, the founder of whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks, has been awarded an award “for exceptional courage in pursuit of human rights”.

6:56PM BST 10 May 2011


Mr Assange was given the Sydney Peace Medal at a ceremony at the Frontline Club in central London today.

The Sydney Peace Foundation said that it was making the award to recognise Mr in recognition of the need “for greater transparency and accountability of governments.”

Professor Stuart Rees, director of the foundation, said: “By challenging centuries old practices of government secrecy and by championing people’s right to know, WikiLeaks and Julian Assange have created the potential for a new order in journalism and in the free flow of information.”

Speaking at the event, Mr Assange referred to whistleblowers as "heroes" and said it appeared the website had played a "significant role" in the recent Arab uprisings in north Africa by releasing US diplomatic cables in December that were later translated into Arabic and French.

He said WikiLeaks was part of England's historic "free speech traditions, these go back in the UK to the time of the English Civil War of the 1640s". He said: “The real value of this award, and the Sydney Peace Foundation is that it makes explicit the link between peace and justice.

Related Articles


“It does not take the safe feel good option of shunning controversy by uttering platitudes. Instead it goes into difficult terrain by identifying organisations and individuals who are directly engaged in struggles of one kind or another.


“With WikiLeaks we are all engaged in a struggle, a generational struggle for a proposition that citizens have a right and a duty to scrutinise the state."


WikiLeaks has caused controversy over the past year by releasing secret US Government documents including reports about detainees held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and hundreds of thousands of US diplomatic cables.


Mr Assange is currently staying in Norfolk while he fights extradition to Sweden over allegations of sexual crimes, which he denies.





_________________________________________________________________________________


Wikileaks News




News March 9-2012


According to a court spokesperson, the judgement for the Supreme Court Appeal hearing will take at least 4 weeks to be delivered (March).

News: Stratfor emails reveal US secret indictment for Assange


Stratfor e-mails have revealed that a sealed indictment has been issued by a secret grand jury in Alexandria, Virginia, for Julian Assange. The email is dated 26 January 2011. This means that there has likely been a sealed extradition order for over a year, which will be activated (unsealed) against Assange in Sweden, Australia and the UK when the US Government gives the order.
The US Centre for Constitutional Rights (CCR) has issued a statement.


NEWS FEB 1-2 2012



Supreme Court Appeal Hearing: 1 and 2 February. Watch it LIVE

Do you want to understand the Big Picture?.
The Supreme Court Appeal Hearing starts at 10:30 on 1 February 2012. The Supreme Court has released a press release about access to the Supreme Court on those days, and has published the case details on their website. Supporters will hold a vigil in front of the Supreme Court before and during the hearing. Find out how to get there. View the map here.

Recent developments

Swedish Prime Minister Reinfeldt attacks Assange in fresh new statements about the Assange case (25 January 2012): "This is typical of someone accused [’anklagad’] of a crime in a different country - to try to cast suspicion on that country or its legal system. One can see similarities with other cases where this technique has been used. Of course we have to stand our ground - we have a system of rule of law that works. And we take rape accusations very seriously - there are special interests trying to disparage how we have developed and how we stand by the good legislation [that is relevant] in this [Assange] case."
Swedish Prime Minister, Fredrik Reinfeldt, criticises Assange on Swedish national radio on 25 January 2012 - only one week before Assange’s team will argue that the European Arrest Warrant has not been subjected to scrutiny by an independent and impartial ’judicial authority’, before the Supreme Court in the UK. Despite this clearly impinging on Julian Assange’s due process rights the prosecutor (Marianne Ny), the Prime Minister (Fredrik Reinfeldt) and the politician-lawyer who represents the women (Claes Borgstrom) have attacked Julian Assange in the media over the past 15 months. Basic inalienable rights to due process, enshrined in the European Convention of Human Rights and the EU Charter, are not being respected when the chief of the Swedish executive and other members of the executive publicly comment on the Assange matter. A full transcript/and translation of Reinfeldt’s reply, which also touches on Sweden’s complicity in extraordinary rendition, is available in Political Interference. See also Professor Ferrada-Noli’s article.

Previous News



  • The UK High Court resumed work on 3 October 2011. The judgement for Julian Assange’s extradition appeal is expected to be announced shortly. Follow @swedenvsassange on Twitter to get the latest news.

NEWS


Update 15 November 2011: Julian Assange’s team have raised the following points of law as grounds to appeal to the Supreme Court:

1) Whether a European Arrest Warrant issued by a partisan prosecutor working for the executive (i.e. not an independent judge or investigating magistrate in the civil law system) is a valid Part 1 Warrant issued by a "judicial authority" within the meaning of sections 2(2) & 66 of the Extradition Act 2003?

  • This point argues that the decision goes against parliamentary intent in the 2003 Extradition Act (see High Court Appeal).
2) Whether a person in respect of whom no decision to prosecute has been taken can be said to be ’accused’ within the meaning of sections 2(3)(a) of the Extradition Act 2003?

Read why these two points are of ’general public importance’ in High Court Appeal (currently being updated).


NEWS


15 November 2011: Julian Assange’s legal team have applied to the High Court for leave to appeal two points of law of general importance at the Supreme Court. The same High Court judges who dismissed Julian Assange’s case at the High Court will decide whether or not to certify these points, which must be of public importance and go beyond the specific facts of this case. They will decide this in open court, at the Royal Courts of Justice on 5 December 2011. A decision is expected the same day. If JA loses, he will be extradited to Sweden within 10 days and placed into Swedish custody.



News


17 November 2011: Julian Assange has appointed two new lawyers, Per E. Samuelson and Thomas Olsson, to represent him in Sweden. Both have extensive experience in highly politicised cases in Sweden. Samuelson is an outspoken critic of the failings of due process in Sweden. He was defence counsel in the Pirate Bay caseThomas Olsson has been engaged in a long-term court battle to expose and quash eight murder convictions of Sture Bergvall, aka Thomas Quick. The Thomas Quick case has become known as Sweden’s most infamous case of miscarriage of justice. Quick is a mental patient who was given opiates in order to reveal suppressed memories and who grew addicted to confessing crimes he had not committed. He has since retracted his confessions and been cleared of half of the murders (the remaining sentences are currently being appealed). Quick’s defence counsel during the murder trials was Claes Borgström, who is now disgraced because of this case and as a result has reported himself to the Swedish Bar Association. Claes Borgström is a high profile politician and laywer representing the two complainants, AA and SW, against Julian Assange.


News


          Update: 24 November 2011 - UK Parliamentary Debate on Extradition
  • Parliament holds a debate on extradition in Westminster on Thursday 24 November. Members of the public are writing to their local MPs to urge them to raise the 1st point of law regarding ’judicial authority’ in the Assange appeal. This point is particularly relevant for parliamentary discussion because the judgement goes against parliamentary intention behind the 2003 Extradition Act.
  • Despite huge public demand for a full debate, the Parliamentary Backbench Business Committee has relegated the debate to Westminster Hall rather than the main chamber of the House of Common where it would be voted on by Members of Parliament. As the Babar Ahmed campaign explains, “Discussions in Westminster Hall are not subjected to a vote and rarely have any practical effect."
  • A petition requesting a full parliamentary debate and vote can be found here.

News




  • 7 December 2011: Julian Assange has now been detained for 1 year without charge. The Supreme Court will deliver their decision on whether admit the appeal on 19 December 2011.
  • 5 December 2011 The UK High Court of Appeal has ruled that one of the two points raised by Julia Assange’s team is of "general public importance" and should be considered by the Supreme Court. The point that succeeded was the question of whether a partisan public prosecutor is a ’judicial authority’ as required by the 2003 Extradition Act. The issue revolves around the notion there must be a separation between the executive and the judiciary when depriving a person of their liberty - in this case when the person concerned has not even been charged and the device used to deprive their liberty is extradition to another state. The court considered this to be a point of general public importance that may affect any person facing similar extraditions to the EU. The point transcended the facts of the case and the Supreme Court will decide whether it will allow the appeal, in principle in 14 days’ time. Mark Summers, representing Mr. Assange, said that since 2005, 60 different cases have challenged the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) at this court on the grounds that it had been issued by a prosecutor, and not by an independent and impartial member of the judiciary. Both the issue of whether a person who has not been charged can be extradited and the point of who is a "judicial authority" authorised to issue an EAW were debated in the UK Parliament. Julian Assange attended the extradition debate after his presence at the High Court, but had to leave before it was over in order to make the curfew. At least three MPs mentioned Julian Assange’s case and the fact that he had not been charged, as well as the judicial authority point.
  • 5 December 2011 The UK High Court of Appeal has ruled that one of the two points raised by Julia Assange’s team is of "general public importance" and should be considered by the Supreme Court. The point that succeeded was the question of whether a partisan public prosecutor is a ’judicial authority’ as required by the 2003 Extradition Act. The issue revolves around the notion there must be a separation between the executive and the judiciary when depriving a person of their liberty - in this case when the person concerned has not even been charged and the device used to deprive their liberty is extradition to another state. The court considered this to be a point of general public importance that may affect any person facing similar extraditions to the EU. The point transcended the facts of the case and the Supreme Court will decide whether it will allow the appeal, in principle in 14 days’ time. Mark Summers, representing Mr. Assange, said that since 2005, 60 different cases have challenged the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) at this court on the grounds that it had been issued by a prosecutor, and not by an independent and impartial member of the judiciary. Both the issue of whether a person who has not been charged can be extradited and the point of who is a "judicial authority" authorised to issue an EAW will be debated in the UK Parliament at 3.30 pm today.
  • 3 December 2011 - Australia: Freedom of Information Act disclosures reveal that US’ WikiLeaks investigation is ’’unprecedented both in its scale and nature’’.

 

News


Sweden Versus Assange is changing its name. We are working on making it a one-stop-shop for information about legal processes against Julian Assange and by proxy, WikiLeaks. ’Sweden Versus Assange’ is the formal name of the extradition case in the UK courts.

  • 19 December 2011: The Supreme Court consideration of the appeal has been rushed forward. Initially it was thought that the panel of judges wold be convened six weeks from 5 December 2011. But extraordinarily so close to Christmas, three Supreme Court judges have agreed to hear the appeal application and a decision will likely be taken that same day (19 December 2011). One source has observed "The timing of the Supreme Court decision - announced as sometime between 19 and 25 December - a bit suspect as this could mean that extradition takes place while the UK Parliament is in Christmas recess. In that eventuality it might miss the scrutiny by the Home Secretary on Human Rights Act 1998 grounds that it should have."


News


19 December 2011: Open Letter to Australian Foreign Minister Kevin Rudd, signed by high level supporters including former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser and Lieutenant Colonel (ret) Lance Collins, Australian Intelligence Corps, see Australia


News


16 December 2011: Julian Assange’s case will be heard by the UK Supreme Court, and is scheduled in for 1st of February 2011 for a two-day hearing. The decision by the Supreme Court panel comes on the same day as Bradley Manning’s pre-trial Art. 32 hearing commences in Fort Meade, near Washington D.C. Read more on Australia.


News


10 December 2011: The Supreme Court consideration of the appeal has been rushed forward. Initially it was thought that the panel of judges wold be convened six weeks from 5 December 2011. But extraordinarily so close to Christmas, three Supreme Court justices have agreed to judge the appeal application and a decision will likely be taken that same day (19 December 2011). One source has observed "The timing of the Supreme Court decision - announced as sometime between 19 and 25 December - a bit suspect as this could mean that extradition takes place while the UK Parliament is in Christmas recess. In that eventuality it might miss the scrutiny by the Home Secretary on Human Rights Act 1998 grounds that it should have."


 

_________________________________________________________________________________

Saturday 23 June 2012


Telegraph.co.uk

WikiLeaks

WikiLeaks news: all the latest news and video on WikiLeaks and Julian Assange.

Click here to find out more!

WikiLeaks Latest

Ecuadorean ambassador to fly home for talks on Assange

The Ecuadorean ambassador is expected to fly to her nation's capital this weekend for talks on WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's request for asylum.
23 Jun 2012

Assange 'could be holed up in embassy for years'

Expert doubts whether WikiLeaks chief would be allowed to leave the country even if granted asylum.
22 Jun 2012

Assange: why I chose Ecuador embassy

Speaking from inside the Ecuadorian embassy, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange explains why he is seeking diplomatic asylum in the Latin American country.
22 Jun 2012

Assange will be arrested regardless of asylum bid

Legal expert claims Assange's only way out of the country is becoming Ecuador's representative to the UN.
22 Jun 2012

Julian Assange must face court, says Jemima Khan

Jemima Khan has called for Julian Assange to answer sex crime allegations in Sweden as he continued to avoid extradition inside the Ecuadorian embassy.
22 Jun 2012

Assange will be arrested regardless of asylum bid

Legal expert claims Assange's only way out of the country is becoming Ecuador's representative to the UN.
21 Jun 2012

Julian Assange's celebrity backers face losing £240,000 bail money

Julian Assange’s celebrity backers face losing the £240,000 they promised to guarantee his bail after he sought political asylum at the Ecuadorean embassy in London.
21 Jun 2012

Assange: Ecuadorean President to rule on asylum

Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, is expected to find out whether Ecuador will offer him political asylum today.
21 Jun 2012

Ecuador's dubious human rights record

Home of the Galapagos Islands, where Charles Darwin observed the evolution of animals and natural selection, Ecuador has been slow to embrace human rights and free speech.
21 Jun 2012

Julian Assange: Q&A - Why seek asylum in Ecuador?

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, has sought asylum in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London under the UN's Human Rights Declaration.
21 Jun 2012

The downfall of a moralising moron

Julian Assange has connived enthusiastically in his own destruction, believes Robert Colvile. And as for Jimmy Carr...
20 Jun 2012
| 837 Comments

Assange's celebrity backers face £240,000 bill over bail breach

Supporters of Julian Assange are facing a £240,000 bill after the WikiLeaks founder breached bail by staying at the Ecuadorean embassy where he is seeking asylum.
20 Jun 2012

Assange 'welcomed by Ecuadorean Embassy'

WikiLeaks founder in 'good spirits' at embassy where he seeks asylum, but friends could lose thousands from his bail breach.
20 Jun 2012

Celebrities could lose thousands from Assange bail breach

Film directors, authors, journalists and socialites who raised £200,000 to secure Julian Assange bail face losing thousands after the WikiLeaks founder breached his bail.
20 Jun 2012
| 90 Comments

Assange faces re-arrest over asylum claim

WikiLeaks founder breaches bail conditions after spending night at Ecuadorean Embassy in London.
20 Jun 2012

WikiLeaks founder's rape accusations: timeline

Here are the key dates in the case against WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange.
20 Jun 2012

Julian Assange seeks asylum in Ecuador

WikiLeaks founder under protection in Ecuadorean Embassy in London after seeking political asylum to avoid extradition.
20 Jun 2012

Julian Assange seeks asylum from Ecuador

WikiLeaks founder walks into Ecuadorian Embassy after losing bid to halt extradition to Sweden.
19 Jun 2012

Court refuses to reopen Assange extradition appeal

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange fails to reopen appeal against extradition to Sweden on sex crime allegations.
14 Jun 2012

Supreme Court dismisses Assange appeal

Julian Assange's appeal against extradition to Sweden has been dismissed by the Supreme Court on a majority verdict.
30 May 2012

The Scarlet Pimpernel of cyberspace

Julian Assange, the founder of the whistle-blowing website Wikileaks, has lost his latest battle against extradition to Sweden but who is the man once described as the elusive Scarlet Pimpernel of cyberspace?
30 May 2012

Julian Assange to be extradited to Sweden

WikiLeaks founder loses his latest attempt to avoid extradition to Sweden over rape and sexual assault allegations.
30 May 2012

Julian Assange to learn if he will be extradited

Supreme Court judges to give judgment on Assange deportation, ending marathon battle in UK courts over Wikileaks founder.
30 May 2012

Julian Assange rape accusations: timeline

Here are the key dates in the case against WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange.
30 May 2012

WikiLeaks: court presses ahead with aiding the enemy charge against Bradley Manning

A US military judge refused on Thursday to throw out a charge that Bradley Manning aided al-Qaeda by allegedly leaking thousands of files to the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks.
26 Apr 2012
Click here to find out more!____________________________
June 16-2012
Facebook Feed
  • No more blood, no more weapons to kill innocent


  • 120 Congressmen have now signed a letter of no confidence in Attorney General Eric Holder. LIKE if you agree with the Congressmen and think the Attorney General should go!
  • ‎120 Congressmen have now signed a letter of no confidence in Attorney General E...
    · · · 14 hours ago ·


    • 5 people like this.

      • Silvia Stagg June 16-2012 Dear Readers: The Impeachment Requirement for Cabinet Members Is Not Lawful as these are not Elected Persons! The US Senate Judiciary Committee has the authority as the most powerful 'Government Oversight Committee' to Remove USAG Eric Holder from Office or Refer his Case to An Independent Counsel for Investigation and if necessary to an Independent Prosecutor. My US Attorney Kenneth Weinstein was forced to 'Retire.' It was my case (after contacting RNC & DNC) which broke the story on the US Attorney Firings, and lead to the US Senate Judiciary Investigating and Referring former USAG Alberto Gonzalez Case to an Independent Counsel. Had USAG Gonzalez failed to resign, his case would have been referred to an Independent Prosecutor for Prosecution. It was on or about July 26-2007, one day before my birthday, when the US Senate Judiciary Member Senator Arlen Spector from Pennsylvania announced the referral of the USAG Alberto Gonzalez case to an Independent Counsel for Investigation, etc. Most cases handled by the esteemed US Attorneys are government corruption cases! Therefore, do whatever you can to support and assist our fine US Attorneys and US Department of Justice personnel. Unfortunately, since we are engaged In Black Ops Tech Sedition, Seditionary Cabinet Members such as USAG Eric Holder, a black ops tech offender, are given much too much protection by our members of Congress and the US President Dictator. This is due to black ops tech 'Influence Peddling' whereby participants (US Government Hierarchy and the Black Ops Murderous Rapist Hoares of Worlds' Film Industry and the Social-Government Elite who actually hate life extension for the masses!) play with dangerous and emasculating concepts-feelings-emotions (frantic sweet surrender love-humble love-astounding love-exquisite joy) and destruction of their personalities via black ops tech ensues (they become rape junkies). And this practice continues as they and everyone else on planet earth suffers and dies down while the powerful devise new torturous scenarios to entertainment their sadistically depraved lustful personalties, as we the huddled masses cry for mercy! We live in times that try men's souls. Pray to God. Be Good To Yourselves and Those You Love. In the meantime, Vote For Mitt Romney for One Term to get away from Barack Obama. Vote out the Older members of Congress. And ALWAYS Support and Vote for Silvia Stagg, A Good Gnome Individual, National Security Victim Witness turned US Presidential Candidate 2012-2028 as Republican-Democratic-Write In Candidate until we get to the White House and free ourselves! Please Keep This Detailed Explanation for future reference. I am not always available to write to you or anyone. Most Sincerely, Your Friend, Silvia Stagg https://sites.google.com/site/silviastaggforpresident 
        and http://speechesbysilviastagg.blogspot.com/

         https://sites.google.com/site/silviastaggforpresident


  • p25-1130uscensus.gov.pdf »    




  • In Support of Contempt Vote For USAG Eric Holder
          Kindly Contact
         The US Congress - 112th Congress
         House of Representatives - D.C. 20515
         House  Representative Darrell E. Issa
         Direct Telephone: 202-225-3906

    ____________________________
    Silvia Stagg For President 2012-2028
    Republican,  Independent Write-In Candidate ....until we get there!
     Presidential Candidate For The General Election of 11- 5-2016
     






    Most Trusted Socioeconomic Infrastructure Programs
    Created by Silvia Stagg


     

    Direct Web Access
     
    Google (Direct Web Access)
    Blogger (Must Have Blog, Be Allowed)
                and http://spacehubusa.blogspot.com/
                       and http://spacecityusa.blogspot.com/
                              and http://spacestationusa.blogspot.com/
                     and http://silviastaggcontributioninfo.blogspot.com/
                           and http://silviastaggscitech.blogspot.com/
          and http://silviastaggcourts-legislation.blogspot.com/
                and http://blackopstechvictimsinfo.blogspot.com/
                      and http://crimevictimsinfo.blogspot.com/
                           and http://targetedwhistleblowers.blogspot.com/ 
                   and http://silviastaggnewsalerts.blogspot.com/
                         and http://silviastaggjusticeforassange.blogspot.com/
                                   and http://silviastagguscensus.blogspot.com/
                 and http://silviastaggarticles.blogspot.com/
                         and http://silviastaggcollegepublished.blogspot.com/
                                 and http://silviastaggarchives.blogspot.com/
                  and http://silviastaggwikiarchives2.blogspot.com/
                          and http://silviastagganonmessages.blogspot.com/
                                 and http://silviastaggstorybook.blogspot.com/
    New! SilviaStagg2016USPresidentialCampaign
     
    Emails 
     
    outlook.com:
    aol.com:
    yahoo.com:
    zoho.com:
     
    Direct Internet Access
     
    FACEBOOK
    1) Facebook Address: silvia.stagg.1
    2) To Access Time Line For Silvia Stagg: Facebook.com/silvia.stagg.1
    3) To Send Email To Silvia Stagg: silvia.stagg.1@Facebook.com
     
     
    Google+ @ silvia stagg
    Facebook.com @ silvia.stagg.1
    Linkedin.com @ silvia stagg 
    Twitter.com @ silvia_stagg
    Twitter.com @ Silvia Stagg2
    StumbleUpon.com @ silvia stagg
    Blogtrottr @ silvia stagg
    Mashable.com @ silvia stagg
    Ustream.com @ silvia stagg
    supervoters.org @ silviastaggforpresident
    votizen.com @ silvia stagg
     
    http://thedemocratichub.com @ Silvia Stagg - http://democrats.org @ Silvia Stagg
    http://teapartynation.com @ silvia stagg - http://rncwomen.com @ silvia stagg
     
     

     


     Your Campaign Contributions Are Always Needed!
    Only US Citizens and US Residents Are Allowed To Give Campaign Contributions To US Candidates and Contributions are generally limited to Twenty Five Hundred – Five Thousand US Dollars (US$2,500.00 – US$5,000.00) Per Person Per Primary-General Election Cycle, Total Per Person: US$5,000.00!  Additionally, we rarely have Runoffs. Yet, Runoffs allow for another $2,500.00 in Contributions per person.  Those who wish to support my US Presidency via “electioneering communications” without contacting myself are allowed to make unlimited contributions, and most likely requires an FEC Form Filed.  Contact FEC/Federal Elections Commission  (999 E St NW Wash-DC 20463 T: 800-424-9530 F: 202-501-3413 I: http://www.fec.gov/info/forms.shtml) for Forms-Information regarding necessary filing of FEC Forms for those making Campaign Contributions.  Anyone making Contributions to Silvia Stagg, as a National Security Victim Witness may do so without FEC Forms.
     
    To Send Cash To: Silvia Stagg in Miami Florida 
    (Dade County) via Money Wire/Money Transfer,
     
    TELEPHONE
    - MoneyGram Cash - English Speaking: 1-800MoneyGram 
    - MoneyGram Cash - Spanish Speaking: 1-800-955-7777
    - Western Union Cash – Telephone: 1-800-225-5227
    INTERNET 
    - Western Union Cash: http://www.westernunion.com/ 
    - MoneyGram Cash:  http://www.moneygram.com/ 
     
    For Sending Donations Via Bank Wire/Direct deposit
    Bank of America, NY 7-129-01-01
    1900 Pine Ave Niagara Falls, NY 14301 – USA

    Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-432-1000 
    Bank T: 1-716-285-9268  Bank Fax: 1-716-286-7056
      

     
    Bank of America Routing Numbers
    1)    International Wire:   BOFAUS3N
    2)    Domestic Wire:        026009593
    3)    Domestic Non Wire-Direct Deposit Routing Number: 021000322
    Bank of America Bank Account Numbers
    1) Silvia Stagg’s Personal Savings Account No.:   483032906838
    2) Silvia Stagg’s Campaign Fund Account No.:
        485010883531
    Kindly email Silvia Stagg (silviastaggforpresident@outlook.com) after making any Contributions and give Silvia Stagg your Name-Address-US Citizenship-US Resident Status. Only Cash Deposits, Money Wires, or Money Transfers are Acceptable! – Thank you!  
     
     
    Vote For Life Extension,Vote For Silvia Stagg, This General Election 11-5-2016!
    _______________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________
     
     Support NASA and Space X Continued United States Aerospace Missions
    Below: 1960's United States NASA Astronauts Moon Mission First Humans To Walk The Moon!
     
     

    Below: Many Staff of Space X Are Former NASA!

     

     
     
     

     

     
     

    eisenhower
    Commander In Chief - President Dwight D. Eisenhower
     
    "The People of the World truly want Peace, someday, the Governments of the World, are going to have to give it to Them."
     
     
    Vote For Life Extension,Vote For Silvia Stagg, This General Election 11-5-2016!

    _______________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________
    _______________________________________________________________

     
     
     







          Help Us Make This A More Beautiful World, If Necessary, One Person At A Time!